Sheikh Saud bin Saqr Al Qasimi seeks to woo Bangladesh’s Minister for Foreign Affairs, Shahriar Alam, MP in Khater Massaad case, raising egregious human rights issues.
There is no doubt about it, Sheikh Saud wants money. With tourism and investment on the decline, with no oil to drill in the emirate of Ras Al Khaimah, with allegations of human rights abuses and torture, RAK is not the glorious well marketed destination Saud had envisaged when he seized the throne ten years ago.
Although his advisor, Swiss National, Dr Khater Massaad, put the emirate on the map and generated billions as the CEO of RAKIA and RAK Ceramics, Sheikh Saud wanted his money too, initiating a series of false allegations against him, ostensibly designed to seize his assets. Several times, Massaad has removed his name from Interpol’s database, a tactic designed to harass and extort funds from victims. Sheikh Saud failed in extradition requests and civil lawsuits taken in Saudi Arabia due to a lack of evidence of any wrongdoing. After failing to prove his case, Sheikh Saud ordered his own personal courts in Ras Al Khaimah to issue legal judgments against Dr Massaad, which he is now using to circumvent due process, and apply for Bangladesh to transfer Massaad’s Bangladeshi interests to the ruler.
Radha Stirling, CEO of Detained in Dubai commented on the case,“This is an outrageous violation of due process. Sheikh Saud has attempted to push through his own without-merit legal judgments, without a court considering the actual facts of the case. He has already failed in other jurisdictions and is simply shopping for a friendlier ally to enforce his fake judgments. In the evidence bundle submitted to Bangladesh, he includes a witness statement from lawyer Karam Al Sadeq, a Jordanian national who is being unfairly jailed by the Sheikh and has sued him in the UK for this very same forced confession. It is almost unbelievable that Sheikh Saud would rely on evidence that has been, according to the lawsuit, the result of human rights violations and torture. It is even more ludicrous if the Bangladeshi courts permit such evidence to be considered.
Comments